By the Borexino Collaboration (H.O. Back et al.)
e-Print: hep-ex/0703044 (Mar 2007)
doi:10.48550/arXiv.hep-ex/0703044
Abstract
A recently published article by Klapdor-Kleingrothaus et al. critiques the limit on the stability of the electron obtained by the Borexino collaboration. We respond here to the criticisms raised by Klapdor-Kleingrothaus and his colleagues, and re-establish that our result is based on very conservative premises and that the “indication of a signal of 1.4 σ” for the decay of the electron in the γ+ν channel, reported by Klapdor-Kleingrothaus and colleagues, is excluded by the Borexino result.